You can compare your documents in a variety of ways through Policy Checking. Some comparison tool options are more effective than others in certain situations, and you may need to use several in the course of a single check to ensure accuracy. The comparison options you choose may depend on the types of documents you are comparing, similarities or disparities in their page count, and the goal of your comparison.
The following sections provide an overview of the tools you will use
most often in your policy checks, Applied’s workflow recommendations for
several common policy checking scenarios, and some frequently asked questions
about using Policy Checking effectively. The colors referenced in this
article are system defaults, which are subject to change by system updates
or user customization. You can modify them by accessing the My Settings option from the menu button.
Selecting the right tools for the task is the key to performing an effective check. Especially if you have experience checking policies manually, familiarize yourself with each of the tools. As you learn which steps of your own process each one corresponds to, you will find that Applied Epic Policy Checking helps you complete your familiar policy checking workflows in a fraction of the time they used to take.
The following tools are generally the most helpful in most policy checking situations:
To disable any of the highlighting options in Match view, click the Highlight all/Highlight button and deselect the checkbox for the highlight option you want to remove.
To enable Lock scrolling functionality in Match view, click the menu button beside the Show Data button and select Lock scrolling from the dropdown menu. Lock scrolling uses Page Down, Page Up, and the scroll bar to keep the documents aligned.
"One Click" Realign: When you use Lock scrolling, document pages sometimes get out of sync. Hover over a word or paragraph with a 100% match and single click on it to realign the pages (double clicking on a word launches a text search).
Depending on the contents of your documents and the purpose of your check, you may also find custom checks and text searches helpful in some situations:
For most policy checks (including the examples in the table below), Applied recommends beginning the check in Snippet view for positive identification of the eight standard checks, switching to Match view when you reach the schedule of forms and endorsements, and then checking the documents in their entirety in Match view. The one exception is a spreadsheet-to-spreadsheet comparison, for which Applied recommends using Match view only.
All of the following scenarios assume a year-over-year renewal with the same carrier. The examples listed for each scenario are not exhaustive. See the Common workflow questions section for recommendations on alternate scenarios. Applied University courses on specific use cases are available in the Applied Epic Product Information area on the Applied Community, for an in-depth walkthrough.
Scenario | Examples | Attributes | Recommended process |
Single line of business |
|
|
Single pass through the eight standard checks (beginning in Snippet view and switching to Match view when you reach the schedule of forms and endorsements) |
Single line of business with simple schedules | Monoline coverages
|
|
Single pass through the eight standard checks (beginning in Snippet view and switching to Match view when you reach the schedule of forms and endorsements), with special attention to validation of coverage schedules |
Simple package coverages |
|
|
Begin with a single pass through the eight standard checks (beginning in Snippet view and switching to Match view when you reach the schedule of forms and endorsements). For multiple lines of coverage (e.g. BOP with Umbrella), consider an additional pass through some or all checks for each line (e.g., limits, deductibles, and forms), if appropriate. |
Complex package or policy coverages |
|
|
Break the check down into multiple passes by line of coverage. These checks may consist of more than two documents (e.g., a proposal, a summary, and a quote), so you may have to anchor different documents throughout the check to validate each one. |
Beyond the four scenarios listed above, some behaviors in Policy Checking are common to comparison situations that transcend policy type. These FAQs address some differences in functionality you may encounter based on variables such as page count, document type, and file format.
In Match view, Policy Checking enables all available highlight options (Matched areas, Partial matches, Un-matched areas, and Moved paragraphs) and disables Lock scrolling by default.
If your documents have similar page counts, enable Lock scrolling and deselect the Highlight > Matched areas option. With the option disabled, 100% matched areas are grayed out.
If your documents’ page counts differ significantly, treat these documents as dissimilar in Match view. Enable Lock scrolling and deselect the Highlight > Match areas option to hide 100% matches and focus on areas of discrepancy instead.
Red or yellow in the scroll bars draws your attention to differences in the documents. However, not all differences are significant:
That depends. Ask yourself these questions:
That depends a great deal on your own working style and comfort level. Depending on the focus and content of your check, you can anchor whichever document you are currently validating to the left side of the screen in order to validate it against the others. For instance, you might anchor the carrier quotation document on the left, and validate carrier quote terms to the policy.
For more complex checks, repeat this process for all documents to ensure accuracy.
Use Snippet view for a positive check and then Match view for a negative check. Remember that coverage forms on the expired policy will not show matches in Match view and that this does not indicate a problem. Instead, concentrate your check on the standard checks and any “checks on the fly” you might add, and take time to validate the forms and endorsements listed on both policies. If you find discrepancies in these lists, you may want to initiate another check that includes other documents, so you can investigate them in detail.
Did the change in carriers include other steps, such as quotations and proposals? If so, you may want to include those documents in the check.
You can compare policies from different carriers using the standard checks, but Policy Checking only identifies differences; it does not perform any coverage (wording) analysis. This analytical work is still up to you.
Click the tab above the currently anchored document and select the document you want to anchor from the dropdown menu.
Not at this time. Any custom check you add is valid only for the current policy check. You must re-add it on subsequent policy checks.
In a year-over-year carrier check, it is usually easiest to “rule out” these items in Match view. Make positive identifications during Snippet view standard checks, then deselect the Matched areas option in Match view to concentrate on only the changes.
Add a custom check and a corresponding text search to assist you in identifying and validating vehicle schedules. Oftentimes, you may include your proposal or summary as well as the policy. Carriers use different verbiage and ordering in their automobile declarations pages, so use a limiting text search (VIN, vehicle identification, etc.). Vehicle is too broad a search term, as it will return results for every instance of that word in the policy documents. You may also want to set up an alternate search for makes.
Policy Checking treats spreadsheet cells as paragraphs. You may see the yellow highlighting that indicates moved paragraphs on individual cells. Red highlights indicate added or deleted cells. Lock scrolling does not work on spreadsheets, which have no page breaks and can scroll horizontally as well as vertically.
In Match view, concentrate on unmatched text/partial matches and items highlighted in red to spot the differences in the schedules. Red in the scroll bar on either document can point you quickly to the differences between risk schedules.
Slight differences in images (such as carrier logos) may display as differences between documents. Disregard these when reviewing results. If one of the documents in your check is a Microsoft Word document that contains images, we recommend removing the images or converting the file to a PDF before including it in the check. Images in Word documents can sometimes overlap or alter the positioning of text, making OCR less reliable. These issues do not occur once the documents are converted to PDF files.